Skip to content
  • BLOGS
  • MAGAZINE
  • JOURNALS
Menu
  • BLOGS
  • MAGAZINE
  • JOURNALS
  • BLOGS
  • MAGAZINE
  • JOURNALS
Menu
  • BLOGS
  • MAGAZINE
  • JOURNALS
Máthé Réka Zsuzsánna

BRICS+ countries speed up the new agricultural trade platform

The new platform would support regional trade and offer improved opportunities for small-scale farms.

Máthé Réka Zsuzsánna 2025.06.04.
Taraczközi Anna

Navigating the Transatlantic Trade Tightrope: An EU Perspective

Meanwhile, Republican voices have also been divided.

Taraczközi Anna 2025.06.02.
Taraczközi Anna

EU’s 26-Measure Plan

A New Dawn for European Startups and Scaleups?

Taraczközi Anna 2025.05.30.
Shakhodat Khoshimova

Role of Hungary in the European policy of Uzbekistan

In recent years, Uzbekistan has intensified its foreign policy efforts.

Shakhodat Khoshimova 2025.05.19.
Ludovika.hu

The Black Sea Submarine Cable

Powering Europe’s Green Future from the Caspian to the EU.

Ludovika.hu 2025.05.19.
The Daily European
Kalas Vivien
Kalas Vivien
kutató, NKE Európa Stratégia Kutatóintézet
  • 2021.07.06.
  • 2021.07.06.

How effective can citizens’ participation be in the Conference on the Future of Europe?

There has been a long-standing debate among politicians and scholars alike about whether there is a democratic deficit in the European Union. One of the main arguments in favour is that the EU is “too distant” from its citizens, people don’t understand the system and they are not involved in the EU’s decision-making process. Hence, one of the purposes of the Conference on the Future of Europe starting this year is bringing Europe closer to its voters and vice versa. Politicians are committed – at least verbally – to put citizens and their will in the focus and want to make sure people’s voices are heard by decision-makers at the European level when it comes to determining the future orientations for the European Union. 

The first, inaugural Plenary of the Conference was held on 19 June and from September, four European Citizens’ Panels will also start. These and the Multilingual Digital Platform mean the three pillars of the event series. However, there are two fundamental reasons why the structure of the Conference is inappropriate for achieving the aim, namely, to make voters feel that their ideas are taken into account by the European elite.

Firstly, the composition of the Conference Plenary. It consists of 433 people from numerous institutions – for example from the EU Council, from national parliaments or the Committee of the Regions -, and although this event is at the top of the conference hierarchy, the number of citizens – 108 people – is only less than a quarter of the total. It is true that this proportion is more than nothing, but the Executive Board could have been more ambitious when they agreed on the structure of the Plenary.

Secondly, the size of the panels at EU level. Each European Citizens’ Panel will have 200 participants who were selected randomly with attention to diversity. This number is high and low at the same time. High, because no topic or issue can be discussed effectively with 200 men and women. There are too many various opinions, so what matters is who can impose their will better. It is low, because the 800 individuals – if we look at all four panels – are just a fraction of the EU’s population – which is around 450 million people.

National Citizens’ Panels and events represent those areas where most people from different backgrounds can participate and exchange views with each other, moreover, according to Joint Declaration contributions gathered in the framework of these events should be taken on board by the European panels, so everyone can feel they have a say in the direction the EU will take. Therefore, the European Union should support Member States to organize more panels such as these at both national and local level, but at the moment these are the ones that politicians and organizers of the Conference are placing the least emphasis on.

Hence, one of the key questions of the whole process is which one is more important: to demonstrate that citizens can also take part in the discussion about the future of Europe or to give a chance to as many individuals as possible to voice their ideas about what kind of European Union they want to live in?

Témakörök: decision-making process, democratic deficit, European Citizens’ Panel, European Union
nke-cimer

LUDOVIKA.hu

KAPCSOLAT

1083 Budapest, Ludovika tér 2.
E-mail:
Kéziratokkal, könyv- és folyóirat-kiadással kapcsolatos ügyek: kiadvanyok@uni-nke.hu
Blogokkal és a magazinnal kapcsolatos ügyek: szerkesztoseg@uni-nke.hu

IMPRESSZUM

Ez a weboldal sütiket használ. Ha Ön ezzel egyetért, kérjük fogadja el az adatkezelési szabályzatunkat. Süti beállításokElfogad
Adatvédemi és süti beállítások

Adatvédelmi áttekintés

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT